대학교 발제때문에 존어리의 조직자본주의의 종언을 읽고 있씁니다.
그런데 너무 오랫동안 영어를 손에 놓아서인지 너무 어렵네요

그래서 이렇게 염치를 무릎쓰고 이렇게 질문해봅니다.
잘 해석이 안되는 부분만 질문합니다.
능력자님들의 도움 부탁드립니다.

The pysical size of towns grew considerably, because of the confused conditions in the boobed out inner cities, and partly because of the belief dating back to Weimar that working place, residence and leisure activities should be physically separated.

In the electrical industy Simens used Munich as a base in order to expand into nine smaller towns within a radius of 100 km of the city.

of the largest 500companies, 80percent anr found in one of the eleven largest agglomerations.


And third, there has been some levelling out in the characteristics and fortunes of different region in West german: those with the higher per capita incomes in 1950 losing ground (hamburg, Nordrthein-Westfalen, Bremen) and those with lower per capita incomes gaining ground by 1970(Bayern, rhienland,lower Saxony).

Keeble, owens and Tompson argue that there has been some tendency for the more rural areas to gain in output and employment, while the more urbanized the area tfe greater the tendency for output and employment to fall: this is shown in table 5.5

Furthermore, unlike all the other socioties analysed here, service employment is not distributed in particularly spatially uneven manner.
it is less concemtrated than employment in general in those lander(독일의 주 명칭) where monst employment is found  

The highest relative concentrations of service employment are to be found in the smaller lander(독일의 주), such as 브레멘, 함부르크 and 베를린, in some cases at leasr because of the importance of public sector employment

most characteristics worsen when moving from cenres towars other agglomerated and non-agglomerated areas and then on to the peripheral regions of the FRG(독일 연방공화국) In respect, however, to employment growth the picture is thr reverse. while in the period 1970-80 most locations, especially those in central locations fell between 1970-80 by 3.9%, the peripheral locations incresed by 1.9%